Oregon Supreme Court· 11/9/2006

State v. Longo

Citations

148 P.3d 892
341 Or. 580
2006 Ore. LEXIS 1179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that selective refusal to talk on some subjects did not foreclose questioning on other subjects
noting that the second question required the state to prove the probability of “future dangerousness”
noting that “probability” as used in ORS 163.150(l)(b)(B) means “more likely than not”
trial court did not err in excluding evidence relating to defendant’s capture and return from Mexico, because it was not relevant to defendant’s character and did not make it less likely that he planned the murders
trial court did not err in excluding evidence relating to defendant’s capture and return from Mexico, because it was not relevant to defendant’s character and did not make it less likely that he planned the murders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Carson, Gillette, Durham, Balmer, Kistler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.