State v. Long
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2835
Syllabus
NEW TRIAL: The common pleas court erred in denying defendant's Crim.R. 33(B) motion for leave to file a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, when the record demonstrated that defendant had, within 120 days of the return of the verdict, been unavoidably prevented from discovering, and from presenting in a new-trial motion, the evidence upon which his proposed new-trial motion depended.
Judges: Myers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court· 1994-09-07· cited 334×
- State ex rel. WLWT-TV5 v. LeisOhio Supreme Court· 1997-01-22· cited 43×
- State v. CarusoneOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-15· cited 13×
- State ex rel. Caster v. Columbus (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-28· cited 6×
- State v. LongOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-23· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.