North Dakota Supreme Court· 10/21/2020

State v. Long

Citations

950 N.W.2d 178
2020 ND 216

Syllabus

A district court's order denying the defendant's motion to dismiss is affirmed. Section 39-08-01(1)(f), N.D.C.C., which requires an individual be advised of the consequences of refusing a chemical test, is unambiguous and does not provide informing drivers of the right to refuse a chemical test.

Judges: Jensen, Jon J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

City of Jamestown v. Casarez
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-04-20· cited 6×
WSI v. Felan
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-06-03· cited 4×
State v. Sackenreuter
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-12-17· cited 1×
State v. Bell
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-12-04· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.
Supreme Court· 2018-05-14· cited 310×
Sanderson v. Walsh County
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-04-21· cited 44×
State v. Kuruc
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 27×
State v. Kostelecky
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-01-22· cited 25×
State v. Jones
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-12-04· cited 19×
Denault v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-07-12· cited 15×
State v. Marcum
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-02-27· cited 14×
State v. Welch
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-07-03· cited 6×
Schulke v. NDDOT
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-03-02· cited 6×
Guthmiller v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-01-22· cited 5×
State v. Comes
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-12-12· cited 5×
State v. Norton
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-06-27· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.