Skip to main content

State v. Logan

Citations

  • 535 N.W.2d 320
  • 1995 Minn. LEXIS 675
  • 1995 WL 458917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the question of whether a juror is impartial is a credibility determination and that appellate courts defer to a district court's finding of impartiality
  • holding that the question of whether a juror is impartial is a credibility determination and that appellate courts defer to a district court’s finding of impartiality
  • holding that the question of whether a juror is impartial is a credibility determination and that appellate courts defer to a district court’s finding of impartiality
  • noting that improper juror selection criteria or the seating of a biased juror undermines the process and is not amenable to harmless-error review
  • stating that “a defendant cannot receive a fair trial at the hands of jurors who [are] inclined to give unqualified credence to law enforcement officer[s] simply because [they are] officer[s]”
  • finding a juror who said he would “try” to set aside prior biased opinions to be biased

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coyne, Anderson, Tomljanovich, Stringer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.