State v. Loeffler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the purpose of the knock- and-announce statute “parallels that of the constitutional guarantees against search and seizure”
• stating that the purpose of the knock-and-announce statute “parallels that of the constitutional guarantees against search and seizure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hicks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-27· cited 17×
• State v. Cable
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-12-09· cited 16×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Payton v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
• Rakas v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
• Jones v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
• United States v. Salvucci
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,879×
• Benefield v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1964-02-12· cited 160×
• Accarino v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1949-11-07· cited 128×
• State v. Hutchinson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-05· cited 19×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-12-01· cited 7×