State v. Litt
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 931
Syllabus
Curative instruction; sufficiency of the evidence; manifest weight of the evidence. In response to defense counsel's potentially misleading comments during closing statements, the trial court properly provided a curative instruction and included the instruction in the written jury instructions. Defendant-appellant's trafficking conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Clary
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 3,391×
- State v. DurrOhio Supreme Court· 1991-03-20· cited 267×
- State v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court· 1988-09-28· cited 259×
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court· 1990-03-14· cited 232×
- State v. ZuernOhio Supreme Court· 1987-08-12· cited 212×
- State v. WhitsettOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-06· cited 110×
- State v. RamosOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-10· cited 79×
- State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-29· cited 46×
- State v. WorleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-28· cited 41×
- Drake v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-12-31· cited 32×
- State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-20· cited 30×
- State v. FlemingOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-03· cited 12×
- State v. BatdorfOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-11· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.