Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/26/1994
State v. Linares
Citations
- 880 P.2d 550
- 75 Wash. App. 404
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing plain and unambiguous language of the statute but noting different and inconsistent remedies applied
- holding, in a consolidated case, that Pam did not have capacity to commit malicious mischief, as only the arresting officer testified at Pam’s capacity hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Agid, Pekelis, Grosse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RamerWashington Supreme Court· 2004-03-11· cited 121×
- State v. T.E.H.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-05-18· cited 30×
- In re the Personal Restraint of HegneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-05-15· cited 27×
- In Re HegneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-05-15· cited 26×
- State v. J.P.S.Washington Supreme Court· 1998-04-23· cited 22×
- State v. MoroCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-07-31· cited 11×
- State v. Diaz-CardonaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-09-27· cited 9×
- State v. J.F.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-07-28· cited 9×
- State v. Erika D. W.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-08· cited 7×
- State v. James P.S.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-08· cited 5×
- State v. JFCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-09-08
- State v. TEHCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-08-04
- State v. JPSWashington Supreme Court· 1998-04-23
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.