Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/19/2022
State v. Liddy
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1673
Syllabus
Consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) factual findings. The trial court did not erroneously impose consecutive sentences when it made the findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) and the record supports those findings.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. EdmonsonOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-08· cited 1,498×
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-22· cited 371×
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-03· cited 38×
- State v. CoxOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-07· cited 15×
- State v. PrimmOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-04· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.