New Mexico Court of Appeals· 4/24/1986
State v. Lewis
Citations
- 719 P.2d 445
- 104 N.M. 218
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that deprivation of right to counsel may amount to structural defect
- “The constitutional right to the assistance of counsel remains with an accused until it is affirmatively shown in the record that defendant’s right has been intelligently, understanding^ and competently waived by him.”
- “A 10 defendant who elects to assert his [or her] right of self-representation in a criminal 11 appeal is required to comply with all applicable rules of appellate procedure[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donnelly, Bivins, Fruman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-01-12· cited 234×
- People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-06-05· cited 31×
- State v. VincentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-06-08· cited 31×
- State v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2014-09-26· cited 29×
- State v. ArellanoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-08-14· cited 24×
- State v. CastilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-03-29· cited 22×
- State v. RotibiNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-01-05· cited 21×
- State v. ReyesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-05-03· cited 20×
- State v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-09-04· cited 14×
- State v. StallingsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2020-08-27· cited 13×
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-10-02· cited 11×
- State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-06-02· cited 10×
- State v. WarnerLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1991-12-27· cited 8×
- State v. BrownNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-03-16· cited 6×
- State v. MendezLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2006-01-17· cited 3×
- State v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2014-03-12
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 3,330×
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-25· cited 405×
- State v. BoyerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-03-26· cited 401×
- State v. FishNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-04-09· cited 118×
- United States v. Robert Bolivar DepughTenth Circuit· 1972-02-23· cited 56×
- Pearce v. CoxTenth Circuit· 1965-12-22· cited 55×
- Owen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-11-02· cited 50×
- State v. RobinsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-04-26· cited 38×
- State v. GreeneNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1978-12-21· cited 26×
- State v. RasconNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-04-14· cited 21×
- United States v. Richard RoweTenth Circuit· 1977-11-10· cited 15×
- United States v. Marie La MonteTenth Circuit· 1982-07-27· cited 15×
- State v. MaplesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-09-11· cited 14×
- State v. PetersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-12-03· cited 12×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-07-05· cited 9×
- State v. HibbsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-06-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.