Nebraska Supreme Court· 9/12/2025
State v. Lewis
Citations
- 319 Neb. 847
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- employing same reasoning to reject multiple punishments double jeopardy claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 1,410×
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-02-19· cited 1,035×
- Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-08-28· cited 1,001×
- Doe v. ZedekNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-01-15· cited 185×
- People v. ReamMichigan Supreme Court· 2008-06-11· cited 143×
- State v. DetweilerNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-03-01· cited 88×
- State v. McBrideNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-07-25· cited 69×
- State v. PruettNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-02-01· cited 58×
- People v. HardingMichigan Supreme Court· 2006-04-07· cited 53×
- State v. Woolridge-JonesNebraska Supreme Court· 2024-05-03· cited 26×
- Gibson v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-11-22· cited 23×
- State v. BallewNebraska Supreme Court· 2015-08-14· cited 19×
- State v. IrishNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-01-15· cited 19×
- Scurlocke v. HansenNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-08-06· cited 17×
- State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-04-26· cited 15×
- State v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court· 2023-07-14· cited 15×
- State v. BideauxNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-04-12· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.