Michigan Supreme Court· 4/7/2006
People v. Harding
Citations
- 506 N.W.2d 482
- 443 Mich. 693
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the traditional lesser included offense test is appropriate where it is probative of legislative intent, but recognizing that the test is not appropriate for predicate-based offenses
- conviction for felony murder upheld where victim died after prosecution for underlying crimes of armed robbery, assault and possession of firearm during commission of felony
- prior conviction of armed robbery and assault with intent to murder no bar to felony murder prosecution where victim died in interim
- “If the substantive crime underlying a felony-firearm conviction must be vacated, then that accompanying felony- firearm conviction also must be vacated.”
- “The Double Jeopardy Clause permits successive punishment or prosecution of multiple offenses arising out of the same conduct only if each offense contains a unique element.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Boyle, Griffin, Mallett, Brickley, Levin, Cavanagh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. . ScottCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-07-14· cited 309×
- People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals· 2006-09-24· cited 250×
- People v. NuttMichigan Supreme Court· 2004-04-02· cited 221×
- People v. SchaeferMichigan Supreme Court· 2005-07-27· cited 156×
- People v. LeeMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 144×
- People v. ReamMichigan Supreme Court· 2008-06-11· cited 143×
- People v. WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-07-21· cited 70×
- State of Iowa v. Anthony George BrothernSupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-06-07· cited 68×
- People v. HerronMichigan Supreme Court· 2001-07-03· cited 67×
- People v. TimsMichigan Supreme Court· 1995-07-05· cited 63×
- People v. Joezell WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court· 2006-05-31· cited 34×
- People v. MinorMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-10-06· cited 30×
- People v. GarciaMichigan Supreme Court· 1995-04-18· cited 30×
- People v. McMillerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-10-18· cited 28×
- People v. PenaMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-10-08· cited 24×
- People v. WardMichigan Court of Appeals· 1994-06-21· cited 21×
- People v. PriceMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-12-15· cited 20×
- State v. RuesgaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2000-11-16· cited 18×
- Daniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2008-07-29· cited 18×
- People v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court· 1997-05-28· cited 14×
Cites
73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court· 1974-05-20· cited 1,945×
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-04-16· cited 1,789×
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 1,620×
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 1,588×
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 1,581×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1975-02-25· cited 1,334×
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 1,215×
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-08· cited 1,084×
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1984-08-02· cited 1,064×
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-02-19· cited 1,035×
- Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-08-28· cited 1,001×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.