State v. Levell.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he appropriate inquiry is whether the trier of fact had sufficient information from which to make an informed appraisal of the witness’s motives and bias.”
• \[T]he trial court's discretion to exclude evidence under HRE Rule 403 only becomes operative after the threshold level of inquiry under the confrontation clause has been afforded.\
• “[E]vidence of witness bias is relevant, and ... the trial court’s discretion to exclude evidence under HRE Rule 403 only becomes operative after the threshold level of inquiry under the confrontation clause has been afforded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Acker.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2014-02-14· cited 27×
• State v. Leibel
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2013-10-25· cited 10×
• State v. Acacio.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2017-06-15· cited 10×
• State v. Miranda.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2020-06-04· cited 6×
• State v. Smith
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2020-08-31
• State v. Luamanu
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2020-09-11
• State v. Iturbide
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2023-02-07

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Delaware v. Van Arsdall
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
• Olden v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1988-12-12· cited 592×
• State v. Estrada
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 106×
• State v. Cordeiro
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-10-07· cited 94×
• State v. Balisbisana
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-09-12· cited 74×
• State v. Mars
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2007-08-16· cited 26×
• State v. Veikoso
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-09-12· cited 10×
• State v. Marcos
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2004-12-02· cited 6×