State v. Leonardo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that victims’ rights continue to be enforceable until restitution is paid and probation is completed
• “In interpreting a statute, we must construe it together with other 4 PICKETT v. BORG Decision of the Court statutes relating to the same subject matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Arizona v. Justin James Chase
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-05-17· cited 17×
• Hirsch v. Arizona Corp. Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-06-25· cited 12×
• DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma County Airport Authority
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-12-16· cited 3×
• State v. Hamilton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-06-25· cited 2×
• Alex Paul Rasmussen v. State of Arizona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-07-01
• In Re Reynaldo P.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-08-02
• State of Arizona v. Hon. butler/valenzuela
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2021-12-30

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Roque
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-14· cited 207×
• State v. Sweet
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-16· cited 136×
• Hobson v. Mid-Century Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-02-27· cited 55×
• State v. Cheramie
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2008-07-29· cited 51×
• Coy v. Fields
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-06-12· cited 39×
• Norgord v. State Ex Rel. Berning
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-11· cited 35×
• State Ex Rel. Romley v. Hutt
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-09-23· cited 25×
• State v. Nichols
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-06-14· cited 12×
• Prince & Princess Enterprises, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-05-15· cited 11×