Skip to main content
· 6/12/2001

Coy v. Fields

Citations

  • 27 P.3d 799
  • 200 Ariz. 442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating order setting aside a plea agreement, where an impermissible probation option did not “materially alter[] the plea agreement”
  • vacating order setting aside a plea agreement, where an impermissible probation option did not “materially alter[] the plea agreement”
  • courts “not always obligated to apply a contract analysis to plea agreements because contract law may not provide a sufficient analogy”
  • “We, too, hold the state accountable for knowing Arizona law when it negotiates, drafts, and enters into plea agreements.”
  • courts “not always obligated to apply a contract analysis to plea agreements because contract law may not provide a sufficient analogy”
  • “The State is generally in the better position to know the correct law . . . and the State must be deemed to know the law it is enforcing.” (quoting State v. Patience, 944 P.2d 381, 387–88 (Utah App. 1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Florez, Brammer, Pelander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.