State v. Lenoir
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 563
Syllabus
The fact that the trial court did not orally inform appellant of his appellate rights prior to accepting his guilty pleas did not render the pleas less than knowing, intelligent, and voluntary where there was no evidence in the record that appellant was confused about his appellate rights. Appellant failed to establish that his guilty pleas were less than knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Judgments affirmed.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court· 1973-04-17· cited 3,425×
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court· 1992-12-18· cited 551×
- State v. SpatesOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-05· cited 321×
- State v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-26· cited 38×
- State v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-04-08· cited 36×
- State v. RuckerOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-10-19· cited 32×
- State v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-18· cited 32×
- State v. BatemanOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-10· cited 21×
- State v. BarnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-05· cited 17×
- State v. McGlownOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-28· cited 14×
- State v. PortisOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-22· cited 10×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.