State v. Lay

Citations

• 169 N.E.3d 249
• 2021 Ohio 892

Syllabus

The evidence was sufficient to convict appellant for violating a protection order. Appellant was informed of the protection order by a law enforcement officer in accordance with R.C. 2919.27(D). The reissuance of the ex parte protection order did not require additional notice to appellant because the reissuance was merely an extension of the order, not a separate order.