Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/28/2021

State v. Guzman

Citations

2021 Ohio 2168

Syllabus

To prove a violation of R.C. 2919.27(A), the State does not need to prove that service of process of a consent agreement was effectuated on the defendant if, pursuant to R.C. 2919.27(D), the State can establish that defendant had been shown the consent agreement or had been informed of the consent agreement by a judge, magistrate, or law enforcement officer.

Judges: Willamowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court· 2013-04-30· cited 32×
State v. Tolle
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-05· cited 21×
State v. Kidd
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-22· cited 6×
State v. Johnson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-30· cited 5×
State v. Ponce
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-24· cited 4×
State v. Wilson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-23· cited 4×
State v. Doss
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-07· cited 3×
State v. Lay
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-22· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.