State v. Lash
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 6025
Syllabus
Motion for application for DNA testing; outcome determinative; abuse of discretion; contrary to law. Trial court's decision to deny the appellant's motion for application for DNA testing is contrary to law and, thus, an abuse of discretion because it did not engage in an analysis of defense theories or provide the reasons on which it relied in reaching its conclusion that the DNA test would not be outcome determinative.
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.