State v. Larkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is generally agreed that the decision of what evidence should be introduced at trial is considered strategic or tactical.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Aragon v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1988-08-25· cited 552×
• State v. Payne
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2008-12-15· cited 235×
• Russell v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-07-03· cited 216×
• Larkin v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-10-27· cited 147×
• State v. Azad Haji Abdullah
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2015-03-02· cited 106×
• State v. Hairston
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1999-08-24· cited 105×
• State v. Olin
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-07-09· cited 90×
• Davis v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1989-07-25· cited 83×
• State v. Pratt
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1993-07-27· cited 78×
• State v. Chapman
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1991-09-06· cited 69×
• Ivey v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 66×
• Estes v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1986-07-31· cited 53×
• State v. Lankford
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1987-07-29· cited 52×
• Drapeau v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-09-13· cited 47×
• State v. Darbin
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-10-25· cited 42×
• Mitchell v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 32×
• Marsalis v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2020-02-18· cited 20×
• Flores v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1983-01-18· cited 19×
• Cunningham v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-03-05· cited 12×
• State v. Kelling
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-05-21· cited 9×