State v. Lanier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendant’s prior conviction for robbery was not crime of “dishonesty or false statement” within meaning of Rule 609(a)(2), unless it was committed by fraudulent or deceitful means bearing directly on the defendant’s likelihood to testify truthfully
• robbery and second degree burglary not crimes of \dishonesty or false statement\ unless committed by fraudulent or deceitful means bearing directly on defendant's likelihood to testify truthfully
• robbery and second degree burglary not crimes of “dishonesty or false statement” unless committed by fraudulent or deceitful means bearing directly on defendant’s likelihood to testify truthfully

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Al-Amin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-03· cited 37×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-03-27· cited 31×
• Robinson v. Paul Ray Taylor, M.D.
  Utah Supreme Court· 2015-08-11· cited 18×
• State v. Cravens
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2000-12-07· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Knight
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-03-19· cited 236×
• State v. Verde
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-02-03· cited 205×
• State v. Fontana
  Utah Supreme Court· 1984-03-02· cited 74×
• State v. Banner
  Utah Supreme Court· 1986-04-14· cited 64×
• State v. Gentry
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-12-01· cited 61×
• State v. Bruce
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-07-28· cited 48×
• State v. Cintron
  Utah Supreme Court· 1984-03-07· cited 9×