Skip to main content

State v. Langston

Citations

  • 196 P.3d 84
  • 223 Or. App. 590
  • 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, under Article I, section 9, that, “[in Dempster], the Supreme Court *** held that an arrest based on an outstanding warrant can serve to attenuate the link between unlawful police conduct and subsequently discovered evidence”
  • under the “Dempster/Snyder rule,” the “discovery and execution of the outstanding warrant for defendant’s arrest purged the taint of any prior unlawful stop”
  • “ [a]pplying the Dempster/ Snyder rule to [the] case,” and concluding, under Article I, section 9, that “the discovery and execution of the outstanding warrant for defendant’s arrest purged the taint of, any prior unlawful stop”
  • con- cluding, under Article I, section 9, that, “[in Dempster], the Supreme Court * * * held that an arrest based on an outstanding warrant can serve to attenuate the link between unlawful police conduct and subsequently discovered evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollheim, Sercombe, Riggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.