State v. Lampe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• right invoked by asking prosecutor, “Do you think I ought to have an attorney?”
• “It is apparent that, in the face of the direct question, ‘Do you think I ought to have an attorney,’ the Miranda rule should have triggered an immediate cessation of the conversation even had there not been previous requests for a lawyer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Middleton
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1986-11-20· cited 23×
• State v. Lee
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-02-06· cited 14×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Edwards v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
• Rhode Island v. Innis
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
• Oregon v. Bradshaw
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
• United States v. Donna Ballard
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-12-22· cited 134×
• State v. Cydzik
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1973-10-30· cited 83×
• Turner v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-02-15· cited 66×