West Virginia Supreme Court· 12/11/2001

State v. Ladd

Citations

557 S.E.2d 820
210 W. Va. 413
2001 W. Va. LEXIS 181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“The decision whether to grant a motion for separate trials ... rests in the sound discretion of the trial court.”
“[W]e are unable to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the improper admission of ... out-of-court statement was harmless to the jury’s determinations on the first and second counts of the indictment.”
“Due to the possibility of retrial upon remand, we find it necessary to address some of the other assignments of error alleged by the defendant in order to provide guidance to the trial court upon remand.”
“Our rule says that credibility determinations are for the jury[.]”
“Our rule says that credibility determinations are for the jury[.]”
remanding inevitable discovery rule issue to trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maynard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.