Skip to main content

State v. Lachapelle

Citations

  • 308 A.2d 467
  • 112 R.I. 105
  • 1973 R.I. LEXIS 960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the defendant’s incriminating statement, “with its corroborating impact on other evidence adduced through defendant himself, beyond a reasonable doubt contributed to the verdict of the jury” and could not be considered harmless
  • explaining the holding in Chapman

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, Paolino, Kelleher, Doris, Joslin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.