State v. Kypreos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• if defendant were able to establish reasonable expectation of privacy, invocation of automatic standing doctrine would be “completely unnecessary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-31· cited 68×
• State v. Parris
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-08-09· cited 25×
• State Of Washington, V. Roman James Allah
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2024-06-17

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Rakas v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
• Jones v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
• South Dakota v. Opperman
  Supreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
• Cady v. Dombrowski
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
• Rawlings v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
• United States v. Salvucci
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,879×
• Cooper v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
• Oregon v. Hass
  Supreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
• California v. Carney
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,276×
• PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 1,093×
• State v. Hendrickson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
• State v. Ladson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-07-01· cited 415×
• State v. Stroud
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 292×
• State v. Alston
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-10-21· cited 275×
• Commonwealth v. Sell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-30· cited 268×
• State v. Simpson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 247×
• State v. Houser
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 235×
• State v. Johnson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-01-18· cited 221×
• State v. Tanner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 194×
• UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Howard VAN POYCK, Defendant-Appellant
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-02-20· cited 182×