Skip to main content

State v. Kurtz

Citations

  • 278 P.2d 406
  • 78 Ariz. 215
  • 1954 Ariz. LEXIS 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that police officers who were privately paid and \employed as 'bouncers' or 'watchmen'\ were peace officers discharging the duties of their office when they intervened to breakup a disturbance on the employer's premises
  • determining factor is whether the officers were acting in vindication of the public right and justice or were they merely performing acts of service to their private employer
  • determining fac tor is whether the officers were acting in vindication of the public right and justice or were they merely performing acts of service to their private employer
  • in arresting defendant who had committed misdemeanor in their presence, off-duty officers employed as private security officers “were not performing mere acts of service for their private employer but were acting in vindication of the public right in apprehending a wrongdoer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Udall, Phelps, Stanford, Prade, Windes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.