Arizona Supreme Court· 12/28/1954
State v. Kurtz
Citations
- 278 P.2d 406
- 78 Ariz. 215
- 1954 Ariz. LEXIS 155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that police officers who were privately paid and \employed as 'bouncers' or 'watchmen'\ were peace officers discharging the duties of their office when they intervened to breakup a disturbance on the employer's premises
- determining factor is whether the officers were acting in vindication of the public right and justice or were they merely performing acts of service to their private employer
- determining fac tor is whether the officers were acting in vindication of the public right and justice or were they merely performing acts of service to their private employer
- in arresting defendant who had committed misdemeanor in their presence, off-duty officers employed as private security officers “were not performing mere acts of service for their private employer but were acting in vindication of the public right in apprehending a wrongdoer”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Udall, Phelps, Stanford, Prade, Windes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-11-26· cited 235×
- White v. Revco Discount Drug Centers, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2000-11-22· cited 124×
- State v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court· 1996-12-05· cited 67×
- Duncan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-07-16· cited 48×
- State v. PhillipsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1999-07-14· cited 19×
- State v. DussaultSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1979-06-29· cited 17×
- In re JESSI W.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-02-20· cited 13×
- Salt Lake City v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2007-07-27· cited 9×
- State v. OvensCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-01-27· cited 8×
- State v. ArceCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-09-13· cited 7×
- State v. FeldsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-11-09· cited 4×
- State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-12-18· cited 2×
- Jamesena White v. The City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1999-10-15
- Jamesena White v. The City of KnoxvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1999-10-15
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Platt v. GreenwoodArizona Supreme Court· 1937-07-06· cited 21×
- Neallus v. Hutchinson Amusement Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1927-12-22· cited 18×
- Tomaris v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1950-11-21· cited 11×
- Stapleton v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court· 1938-12-05· cited 6×
- Russell v. GlascowArizona Supreme Court· 1945-10-01· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.