White v. Revco Discount Drug Centers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Tenn. R. Civ. P. 12.02(6) m otions require the co urts to p resum e that a com plaint’s factual allegations are true
• noting that the existence of agency “is a question of fact under the circumstances of the particular case”
• stating that a principal may be held liable for an agent’s tortious act, “even if that act occurs outside of the scope of the agency, if the act was commanded or directed by the principal”
• stating that “allegations of pure legal conclusions will not sustain a complaint”
• stating that a principal may be held liable for an agent’s tortious act, “even if that act occurs outside of the scope of the agency, if the act was commanded or directed by the principal”
• stating that “allegations of pure legal conclusions will not sustain a complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).