State v. Kunkel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating \there is an implied condition in every probation or suspended sentence that the defendant shall not commit further violations of the criminal law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Ballensky
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-11-19· cited 11×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Austin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 156×
• United States v. John Andrew Dane
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-03-01· cited 83×
• State v. Holter
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-11-30· cited 51×
• Commonwealth v. Mallon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-06-15· cited 44×
• People v. Thrash
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-05-12· cited 42×
• State v. McGinnis
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1976-06-30· cited 37×
• Wilcox v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1981-01-09· cited 37×
• Ross v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-03-03· cited 32×
• State v. Michlitsch
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-03-27· cited 32×
• Denomie v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-12· cited 32×
• State v. Kunkel
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-04-25· cited 27×
• State v. Kunkel
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-03-01· cited 23×
• Jaynes v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-07-08· cited 19×
• State v. Acosta
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-10-10· cited 7×
• Oksoktaruk v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-11-21· cited 7×