Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/3/1999
State v. Kruelski
Citations
- 250 Conn. 1
- 737 A.2d 377
- 1999 Conn. LEXIS 272
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court judgment of acquittal that was based solely on statute of limitations and that did not resolve any element of offense charged did not trigger double jeopardy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Callahan, McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-28· cited 53×
- Edward Kruelski, Jr. v. State of Connecticut Superior Court for the Judicial District of Danbury and Geographical Area 3 at DanburySecond Circuit· 2003-01-03· cited 28×
- State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-08-18· cited 17×
- Kendall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-27· cited 10×
- State v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-03-04· cited 7×
- State v. JIMENEZ-JARAMILLConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-03-20· cited 6×
- Kruelski v. Connecticut Superior Court for the Judicial District of DanburyD. Connecticut· 2001-05-31· cited 2×
- State v. JamisonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-09-16
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
- United States v. JornSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 1,668×
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court· 1977-04-04· cited 1,460×
- United States v. BallSupreme Court· 1896-05-25· cited 1,376×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1975-02-25· cited 1,334×
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1988-11-14· cited 1,183×
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-07· cited 1,138×
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,038×
- Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 449×
- United States v. SissonSupreme Court· 1970-06-29· cited 388×
- Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-22· cited 284×
- Forman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-02-23· cited 239×
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-05-17· cited 195×
- Sapir v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-03-07· cited 114×
- State v. AliSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-06-06· cited 72×
- State v. LonerganSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-11-28· cited 57×
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-01-20· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.