Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/20/2011
State v. KNUTZ
Citations
- 253 P.3d 437
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that when the State presents evidence of multiple acts, unanimity is required for the particular criminal act
- stating that when the State presents evidence of multiple acts, unanimity is required for the particular criminal act
- numerous acts of fraud against the same investor over a period of 29 months constituted a continuing course of conduct because the purpose was “‘to promote an enterprise with a single objective’— to obtain money through deceit.”
- numerous acts of fraud against the same investor over a period of 29 months constituted a continuing course of conduct because the purpose was “‘to promote an enterprise with a single objective’— to obtain money through deceit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. McCrevenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-09-05· cited 90×
- State Of Washington v. Brian K. BrushCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-08-28· cited 17×
- State Of Washington, V David Y. BogdanovCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-07-25· cited 7×
- State Of Washington, V Britt Augustus AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-03-27· cited 5×
- State v. BergstromWashington Supreme Court· 2022-01-27· cited 5×
- State of Washington v. Karrlee Theresa ClementsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-08-02· cited 2×
- State Of Washington, Resp. v. Daniel Galeana Ramirez, Alejandro Ramirez, And Steven Russell, App.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-01-03
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
- State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 697×
- State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court· 1984-05-17· cited 556×
- State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court· 2004-07-06· cited 499×
- State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court· 1993-03-04· cited 350×
- State v. BennWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 303×
- Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court· 1996-10-24· cited 226×
- Keller v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court· 2002-04-25· cited 193×
- State v. StephensWashington Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 165×
- State v. RitchieWashington Supreme Court· 1995-05-11· cited 160×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2007-03-15· cited 151×
- State v. HandranWashington Supreme Court· 1989-07-25· cited 134×
- State v. DanaWashington Supreme Court· 1968-04-04· cited 120×
- State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court· 2010-03-04· cited 117×
- State v. WiningsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-02-23· cited 98×
- State v. KolesnikCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-09-16· cited 90×
- State v. SublettCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-05-18· cited 72×
- State v. CreekmoreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-01-16· cited 69×
- State v. KnutzCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-04-20· cited 42×
- State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-09-23· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.