Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/13/2019

State v. Kitzler

Citations

2019 Ohio 5146

Syllabus

Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law where the trial court expressly considered the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11, the sentencing factors under R.C. 2929.12 and 2929.13, and the factors pertaining to the imposition of consecutive sentences under R.C. 2929.14, prior to imposing sentence.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Foster
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
State v. Mathis
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
State v. Arnett
Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
Estelle v. Dorrough
Supreme Court· 1975-04-14· cited 312×
State v. Brimacombe
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-30· cited 96×
State v. O'Neill
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-11-23· cited 10×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.