Skip to main content
· 12/13/2019

State v. Kitzler

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 5146

Syllabus

Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law where the trial court expressly considered the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11, the sentencing factors under R.C. 2929.12 and 2929.13, and the factors pertaining to the imposition of consecutive sentences under R.C. 2929.14, prior to imposing sentence.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.