Skip to main content

State v. Kinney

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 629

Syllabus

Ineffective assistance of counsel motion to suppress consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). Appellant was not denied his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel. The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences because it complied with R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) and made the requisite consecutive sentence findings.

Judges: Celebrezze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.