State v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘Generally, no witness may offer testimony in the form of an opinion regarding the guilt or veracity of the defendant; such testimony is unfairly prejudicial to the defendant because it invad[es] the exclusive province of the [jury].’” (internal quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Haq
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-01-30· cited 33×
• State v. Blake
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-12-24· cited 30×
• State of Washington v. Tishawn Marqueis Winborne
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-06-26· cited 17×
• State v. Quaale
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-11-07· cited 5×
• State v. Janda
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-10-01· cited 3×
• State Of Washington v. Steven Andrew Janda
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-10-01
• State v. King
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-10-15
• State of Washington v. Ryan Richard Quaale
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-11-07

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• State v. Kirkman
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-04-05· cited 747×
• State v. Scott
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 576×
• State v. Demery
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-09-13· cited 270×
• State v. Montgomery
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-05-15· cited 269×
• State v. Black
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-11-05· cited 192×
• City of Seattle v. Heatley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-07-12· cited 190×
• State v. Jacobsen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1970-11-12· cited 109×
• State v. Plaggemeier
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-01-08· cited 13×
• City of Tacoma v. Durham
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-06-03· cited 9×