State v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• shoplifting statute using term “full retail value,” defined as “ ‘the merchant’s stated or advertised price of the merchandise’ ”
• price tag alone sufficiently proves value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Downing
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-11-26· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Hanes
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-09· cited 44×
• State v. Ybarra
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-05-02· cited 34×
• State v. McPhie
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1983-04-18· cited 31×
• Morris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2014-09-26· cited 31×
• State v. Varona
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-07-12· cited 30×
• State v. Rodriguez
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-03-04· cited 12×
• State v. Bellamy
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-03-29· cited 9×
• State v. Contreras
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-01-11· cited 4×
• State v. Fort
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-10-25· cited 3×
• State v. King
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-03-27· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• George Herman v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1961-06-21· cited 126×
• People v. Irrizari
  New York Court of Appeals· 1959-01-08· cited 85×
• State v. McDonald
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-03-11· cited 64×
• Maisel v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1968-06-17· cited 52×
• Lauder v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-12-10· cited 39×
• People v. Cook
  California Court of Appeal· 1965-04-05· cited 27×
• State v. Randle
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-02-11· cited 11×
• State v. Hill
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-11-16· cited 4×