State v. Kido

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that some courts have “noted the distinction between the statutory directive in Brooks and the trial court directive before them, though none have explained why the distinction makes a constitutional difference” (footnote omitted)
• defendant required to testify first based on State’s inability to produce defense’s other witness at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Frank Loher v. Todd Thomas
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-06-17· cited 36×
• State v. Acker.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2014-02-14· cited 27×
• People v. Walden
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-07-23· cited 23×
• Loher v. State
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2008-07-31· cited 20×
• State v. Kido
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2006-02-14· cited 17×
• State v. Loher.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2017-07-20· cited 12×
• State v. Sale
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2006-04-18· cited 10×
• Loher v. Thomas
  D. Hawaii· 2014-05-31· cited 7×
• State v. Gomes
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2005-03-23· cited 4×
• Stoddard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-11-03· cited 4×
• State v. Wise
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2005-03-08· cited 2×
• State v. Westbrook
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2008-05-28