Skip to main content

State v. Keys

Citations

  • 125 So. 3d 19
  • 2013 WL 4759279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to review identification testimony for hearsay where the defendant did not object to the testimony on that basis when it was introduced
  • remoteness in time is a factor to be considered when weighing probative value against prejudicial effect
  • the State need not prove actual possession of the narcotics; constructive possession is sufficient; the State must prove that the defendant had dominion and control over the drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Belsome, Bonin, Lombard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.