State v. Captville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘Lying’ has been recognized as indicative of an awareness of wrongdoing.”
• “ ‘Lying’ has been recognized as indicative of an awareness of wrongdoing.”
• “ ‘Lying’ has been recognized as indicative |inof an awareness of wrongdoing.”
• In cases involving circumstantial evidence, when “the jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence presented by the defendant[ ], that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a reasonable doubt.”
• “When a case involves circumstantial evidence, and the jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence presented by the defendant’s own testimony, that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a reasonable doubt.”
• “When a case involves circumstantial evidence, and the jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence presented by the defendant’s own testimony, that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).