Supreme Court of Kansas· 8/1/2003

State v. Kessler

Citations

73 P.3d 761
276 Kan. 202
2003 Kan. LEXIS 479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that court could not improvise sentencing jury proceeding to respond to Apprendi
where district court’s authority to impose sentence is controlled by statutory procedure found unconstitutional, district court has no authority to impose such sentence
district court’s ruling on discovery subject to abuse of discretion standard; such discretion abused “only when no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court”
where court’s authority to impose sentence is controlled by statutory procedure found unconstitutional, court has no authority to impose such sentence
where court's authority to impose sentence is controlled by statutory procedure found unconstitutional, court has no authority to impose such sentence
in order for voluntary intoxication instruction to be required, there must be evidence defendant was so intoxicated he or she was robbed of mental faculties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gernon, Abbott, Knudson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.