Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/7/2025

State v. Kendall

Citations

2025 Ohio 2394

Syllabus

Sentencing; Competency. Maximum sentence was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law. Appellant did not demonstrate that he was incompetent such that his counsel was ineffective for failing to request an evaluation.

Judges: Waldick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Harris
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-07· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
Medina v. California
Supreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 1,180×
State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
State v. Bock
Ohio Supreme Court· 1986-12-24· cited 231×
State v. Bryant
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-06-07· cited 205×
State v. Maggette
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-29· cited 90×
State v. Noble
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-15· cited 88×
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-13· cited 80×
Robert Lee Alexander v. Richard L. Dugger
Eleventh Circuit· 1988-03-28· cited 48×
State v. Houtz
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-24· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.