State v. Houtz
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1008
Syllabus
Felony Sentencing; R.C. 2953.08(G)(2); R.C. 2929.11; R.C. 2929.12; Crim.R. 11; Substitution of Counsel. Defendant-appellant's prison sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law. Defendant-appellant did not demonstrate that his plea was anything other than knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant-appellant's request for new counsel.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court· 1988-07-06· cited 374×
- State v. BryantOhio Supreme Court· 2022-06-07· cited 205×
- State v. StoneOhio Supreme Court· 1975-07-16· cited 134×
- State v. MaggetteOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-29· cited 90×
- State v. NobleOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-15· cited 88×
- United States v. Kevin Elwood KrzyskeSixth Circuit· 1988-03-09· cited 81×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-13· cited 80×
- State v. WattsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-07· cited 13×
- State v. HamptonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-12· cited 5×
- State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-27· cited 3×
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-28· cited 3×
- State v. SandersOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-03· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.