Skip to main content

State v. Keeton

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 950

Syllabus

Following a jury trial, appellant and a co-defendant were convicted of aggravated robbery and misuse of a credit card. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by granting the State's motion to consolidate the appellant's case and the co-defendant's case. Also, the appellant was not prejudiced by any statements made by the prosecutor at trial. Judgment affirmed.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We presume that juries follow the instructions provided to them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.