State v. Keeton
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 950
Syllabus
Following a jury trial, appellant and a co-defendant were convicted of aggravated robbery and misuse of a credit card. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by granting the State's motion to consolidate the appellant's case and the co-defendant's case. Also, the appellant was not prejudiced by any statements made by the prosecutor at trial. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We presume that juries follow the instructions provided to them.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- State v. FranklinOhio Supreme Court· 1991-11-20· cited 798×
- State v. TorresOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 471×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2000-12-27· cited 313×
- State v. BrinkleyOhio Supreme Court· 2005-04-13· cited 180×
- State v. HannaOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-22· cited 176×
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-21· cited 36×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.