State v. Keeley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting State’s argument that Defendant’s attempt to address State’s improper commentary on invocation of right to remain silent became harmless after Defendant’s counsel asked a few questions “to try to minimize the damage”
• to find a deliberate error harmless “would just encourage similar constitutional error in the future”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Palenkas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-12-19· cited 35×
• State v. Melendez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-07-25· cited 13×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Brecht v. Abrahamson
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
• Doyle v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
• Wainwright v. Greenfield
  Supreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 752×
• State v. Anderson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-12-20· cited 71×
• State v. Sorrell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-04-22· cited 39×
• State v. Bowie
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-06-23· cited 34×
• State v. Salcido
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-05-07· cited 17×
• State v. Downing
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-05· cited 2×