Skip to main content

State v. Kaufman

Citations

  • 201 N.W.2d 722
  • 1972 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding notice served on attorney who may have been representing defendant was insufficient
  • “Actual notice, manifested by the special appearance, is no substitute for service of notice according to statute.”
  • “Actual notice . . . is no substitute for service of notice according to statute.”
  • “Actual notice . . . is no substitute for service of notice according to statute.”
  • “Search warrant proceedings are in rem, directed primarily against the property, not the owner.”
  • “The forfeiture proceeding and the criminal actions are separate and independent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Uh-Lenhopp, Reynoldson, Harris, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.