In Re the Property Seized for Forfeiture From Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the State failed to follow the 90-day rule after the owner requested the property’s release, the State lost its right to move for forfeiture and the district court lost the authority to hear the forfeiture action
• acknowledging the State’s duty under section 809A.8(2)(b) to file a notice of pending forfeiture against the property within ninety days after seizure was triggered by the property owner’s filing of a claim for the return of the seized property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).