Hawaii Supreme Court· 1/31/2000

State v. Kaufman

Citations

991 P.2d 832
92 Haw. 322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “it is clear that the DAG[P] deferral period is closely analogous to a ‘probationary period ’ ” (emphasis added)
holding that \it is clear that the DAG[P] deferral period is closely analogous to a `probationary period '\ (emphasis added)
holding that “the DAG deferral period is closely analogous to a probationary period” such that “the probation tolling statute ... applies analogously to the deferral of a DAG[P]” (internal quotation marks omitted)
holding that \the DAG deferral period is closely analogous to a probationary period\ such that \the probation tolling statute . . . applies analogously to the deferral of a DAG[P]\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
concluding that the express language of the DAGP statute as well as “the public policy concerns and legislative intent underlying the tolling of probation” rendered that provision “equally applicable to the tolling of a deferral period pursuant to [a] DAG[P]”
concluding that the express language of the DAGP statute as well as \the public policy concerns and legislative intent underlying the tolling of probation\ rendered that provision \equally applicable to the tolling of a deferral period pursuant to [a] DAG[P]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.