Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/14/2025

In re K.B.

Citations

2025 Ohio 4714

Syllabus

Manifest Weight of the Evidence; Breaking and Entering; Vandalism; Identity; Evidence Admissibility; Authentication; Evid.R. 901. The child-appellant's breaking and entering and vandalism adjudications were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting photographs into evidence because the State properly authenticated the photographs by presenting testimony from a witness with personal knowledge of the scene.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Dehass
Ohio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
State v. Adams
Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
State v. Hunter
Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
State v. Haller
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-13· cited 264×
State v. Martinez
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-22· cited 88×
State v. Banks
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-03· cited 44×
State v. Johnson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-24· cited 39×
State v. Green
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-04· cited 13×
State v. Kammeyer
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-27· cited 8×
State v. Brentley
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-07-24· cited 7×
In re J.D.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-30· cited 5×
In re A.F.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-28· cited 4×
State v. Handshoe
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-11· cited 4×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.