State v. Kammeyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a party who is actively instrumental in bringing about an alleged error cannot obtain reversal on appeal based on that error
• “[A] party who was actively instrumental in bringing about an alleged error cannot be heard to complain, and the case ought not to be reversed because of it.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
• “Under the invited error doctrine, a party who was actively instrumental in bringing about an alleged error cannot be heard to complain, and the case ought not to be reversed because of it.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
• under doctrine of invited error, “a party who was actively instrumental in bringing about an alleged error cannot be heard to complain, and the case ought not to be reversed because of it” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Under the invited error doctrine, a party who ‘was actively instrumental in bringing about’ an alleged error ‘cannot be heard to complain, and the case ought not to be reversed because of it.’” (Quoting Anderson v. Oregon Railroad Co., 45 Or 211, 216-17, 77 P 119 (1904).)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miller v. Columbia County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-16· cited 33×
• Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-01-31· cited 15×
• Manusos v. Skeels
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-25· cited 10×
• State v. Saunders
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-12· cited 9×
• State v. Berndt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-09· cited 8×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-15· cited 7×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-06-13· cited 4×
• Underwood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-13· cited 4×
• In re the Marriage of Malpass
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-13· cited 4×
• State v. Flack
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-07· cited 3×
• Peace River Seed Co-Operative, Ltd. v. Proseeds Marketing, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-05· cited 3×
• State v. Dallavis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-10-31· cited 2×
• Hatley v. Umatilla County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-03· cited 2×
• State v. Fernaays
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-11· cited 2×
• State v. Perez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-16· cited 2×
• Springville Corp. v. Stoel Rives LLP
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-09· cited 1×
• Jones v. Mears
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-01· cited 1×
• State v. Rogers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-14
• State v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-14
• Hansen v. Board of Commissioners
  Benton County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-15