Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/9/2016

State v. Berndt

Citations

282 Or. App. 73
386 P.3d 196
2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, by contrast to ORS 131.315(12), “‘theft,’ as used in ORS 131.315(7), does not include ‘identity theft’”
declining to review alleged “plain errors”: “Defendant thus invited the errors of which he now complains, and we therefore do not consider them.”
reversing burglary conviction where “the only conduct on which the state relied at trial to assert that defendant had acted outside the scope of his license, and therefore unlawfully remained on the premises, was his commission of a crime.”
“[T]he legislature intended burglary to be separate from (and not dependent upon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Hadlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.