Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/3/2024
State v. Kamer
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1710
Syllabus
The record shows that the charges of which appellant was convicted are distinguishable from those of which he was acquitted. Thus, the record sufficiently shows that retrial on the charges underlying the convictions, which were vacated in appellant's first appeal, will not violate appellant's double-jeopardy rights.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court· 1985-06-05· cited 417×
- State v. LovejoyOhio Supreme Court· 1997-09-24· cited 216×
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court· 2014-02-19· cited 101×
- State v. Mutter (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-24· cited 50×
- Girard v. Giordano (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-18· cited 47×
- State v. HaynesOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-15· cited 28×
- State v. KamerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-17· cited 21×
- State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County· 2017-05-19· cited 7×
- State v. KelleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-23· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.